Wednesday, April 5, 2017

word usage - Using "both" for the subject definition in a negation


As advised by @TRomano in my previous question concerning the use of Either in a negative sentence I ask about the word both in the same role. Here are the examples:




  1. Both this and that fruit are not tasty.


  2. Both cars are not for sale.

  3. Both students will not be restricted.

  4. Both of the lakes are not polluted.

  5. Both paths have not been taken.



Do those sentences sound unnatural? May be even ungrammatical? Or maybe just slightly off?


As I mentioned in my other question, I do not need any help rephrasing those statements using neither. That's an obvious way and a good one too.


My particular concern here is the word both being used for subject in a negation.



Answer




All of those statements do not sound good.
Or, more normally, None of those statements sound good.


Generally, a phrase or sentence has a particular polarity: either positive or negative. In English, there are only a few negative-polarity markers: not, no, never, nowhere, nothing, nobody. When you use one of these markers in a phrase, you "gain license" to use certain words, and "lose license" for others. (I keep being tempted to call these "negative-concord" words, but that is a different (though related) concept.)
In particular, in a negative context, both becomes neither (which also changes plurality: "both are for sale" -> "Neither is for sale"). See the "determination of licensing contexts" section of the wikipedia article on Polarity Items for more details.


Thus, both is not allowed in any of your sentences; Neither is the correct word in all of them.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Simple past, Present perfect Past perfect

Can you tell me which form of the following sentences is the correct one please? Imagine two friends discussing the gym... I was in a good s...