When there's no other verb which indicates the tense in a sentence like
I could eat it.
, not like
I did all I could.
, then does the could-phrase always have present or future tense?
In other words, when the "could+V" is the only verb in a sentence, can this have any meaning related to some past event?
(except the negative form or could+have+pp form or any other special(?) verbs such as "hear","smell")
Answer
When used as a modal verb, then, yes, "could" by itself always refers to present or future possibility.
I could answer this question.
If you want to use this in the past, use "could have"
I could have answered this question.
I'm not sure what part of speech "could" is in, "He did all he could", but as it refers to past events, I see it as an ellipsis for something like:
He did all he could have done.
No comments:
Post a Comment