In a long text about a foraging ant, would it be correct to refer to the ant always as "she" instead of "it"? For example,
She wanders aimlessly until she finds a pheromone trail.
A foraging ant is always a female, so technically it would be correct. However, wouldn't that seem odd to the layperson?
The ant in question is not anthropomorphized at all.
Answer
Here is an excerpt from The Ants, the monumental, 732-page reference on every major topic in the scientific study of ants, by Bert Hölldobler and E.O. Wilson, two of the world's leading authorities on ants:
The Epiritus forager hunts a great deal in small crevices within the soil. Because of the tightness of the passages, she usually encounters the prey in front. The ant immediately crouches and freezes, pulling the antennae completely back into the scrobes that line the sides of her head. The mandibles remain closed. Even though the prey (a collembolan or small centipede) may be very close by, the ant never moves toward it. Instead, she remains perfectly still for periods of 20 minutes or longer, waiting for the prey to step on her head. Then, with a sudden upward snap of her mandibles, she impales the victim on the long apical teeth. [p. 565]
In formal settings, it is perfectly normal and expected to use the pronouns he, she, her, and him to refer to non-human animals when their gender is known. No anthropomorphism is implied.
See also the Chicago Manual of Style.
No comments:
Post a Comment